>>2694342>what do you think the tales of ack, barney fag, etc, tell us? I'm almost positive both ack and barneyfag are bots, and the latter legitimately spams topics with pre-formatted posts while ack seems to be annoyed at an on-topic shipping. Not equivocal to taking issue with obvious anti-"weeb" directed raids to post off-topic trash on this board.
>yes, if you can get the thing banned and get people to not react much it will go away. but sperging out?You know that doesn't happen though, the only board on the site that aren't overrun with tourists spamming wojak shit everywhere are dead hobby boards where they'll get zero thrills out of it (see /po/) or boards with actually semi-effective moderation and gatekeeping like /a/
>have you not seen the kiara threadsKiara is actually a VTuber, and thus on-topic, zero correlation with what I'm taking issue with. Nor is she posted out of legitimate hatred for the subject of this board, in obvious contrast to the /qa/ diaspora spamming that orange shit outside of /co/. I've seen Kiara threads legitimately spammed here only once, and they were appropriately deleted for being obvious spam.
>have you not seen s=0yjak, a meme kept alive entirely by the massive amount of anger caused by posting it?It's kept alive by being an ugly strawman/caricature template and wojak derivative that isn't deleted by moderators, nothing more. Same reason every other retarded wojak variant is on every board that doesn't actively oppose them.
Ignoring bad content means the bad content is unopposed, meaning there's nothing containing it.
