>>26909583>I have a used cerebras cs-1Bullshit. There is no way those are past their service life yet from anyone who invested in one only a few years ago.
Proof?
A corner of the machine with a logo and the thread+date?
Look, I know I am being trolled. I know it's 95% likely you're joking, but I once got my hands on some HPC gear that I shouldn't have...
1. So in case you're not joking: at that level of machine, there might be export controls.
2. Additionally, I assume it's a standard 480 Volts AC, so she won't even have the necessary power hookup to use it.
3. Zero chance she could find a friend who could meaningfully program for it without access to their documentation, which they will not have, and you might not even have.
Lastly, as for "Could it render her 3D?", if you have access to one of these, then you would know better than asking some randos on 4chan. The answer is "no", because while it can do FP-32 it isn't built for anything as simple as processing a stream of video data. I wouldn't expect the libraries to be optimized for that at all. More like crazy CFD or FFT workloads. Giant sparse, N-dimensional matrices, not latency-sensitive graphics workloads.
Both logistically and price-wise, you might as well buy her a A6000 or two than try to negotiate a cabinet-sized supercomputer all the way to Japan.
