>>27011062Were you not following the conversation anon (assuming you are the same anon)? That was your argument, not mine.
Divine law is what it is; those forms of life that are capable of acting in participation with it prosper and predominate over creation, while those that are incoherent with suffer and pass out of creation. Ignorance offers no protection from calamity, except by accident.
This isn't for saying anything overblown like comparing calli to a demonic reprobate in need of extermination, nothing that melodramatic; rather, it's to illustrate in simple terms the relevant principle at work underlaying a wide continuuum of scenarios like this, whether existent or merely conceivable.
Unless they release an official statement to the effect there's no telling what cover may or may not be doing to deal with such problems behind the scenes; but that is also besides the point, which is that there are many things in existence don't depend on your validation to be the case. Which in this case would be the existence of problems, irrespective of whatever is done to deal with them.
