>>29740396>Good looks are less important to women – men who score between 5-9 on ‘attractiveness’ actually receive more messages than men who score 10/10That's a false equivalence which wrongfully implies men and women rate attractiveness the same way, with the same distribution, or have comparable standards in the first place. In reality, because women's perception is so skewed, they see the top 20% as 5-10 rather than 9s and 10s. Accordingly, that prejudices the data in favor of the misleading statement that women actually like guys they think are averagely attractive...completely disregarding the actual objective percentage of guys who meet that standard.
tldr Women's attractiveness ratings are subjective, not objective, and aren't properly weighted to correct for women's bias in favor of the top 20%.
2020's Amegeddon was a good example of women's detachment from reality at play. Irrational attraction to immutable characteristics like hand size plus a lack of self awareness about how attractive the guy is, all based on feelings over rational observations of reality. That's why women are incapable of convincing guus we're wrong about the 80/20 rule, because to convince someone they're wrong you actually have to be realistic, know what you're talking about, and be right. But since reality is sexist, all that'd happen is women's egos getting crushed by the reality that they really are entitled whores who gatekeep 80% of men from getting laid, thereby justifying all the contempt and misogyny directed at them.
At that point women would probably just be calling for a male slavery as a last ditch effort to avoid ever having to reconcile the reality that their freedom is literally harmful to society, and since somebody still has to make the trains run on time. Cue civilwar and strife, and then who knows what'd happen. Perhaps that's why the lies are being propped up by normalfag society, to avoid that outcome.
