>>33216114None of your points are cogent, or based on any evidence. I think you're confusing a fucking indie that likes to wax philosophical about whether or not parasocial shit was good, and the takeaway is the one anyone with a brain could give you, which was that it is in moderation.
Again, you have nothing to back up your claim. This is all based on your feelings, on how that tweet made you feel, or what it made you think parasocials might feel.
Because if you want to get into semantics, she could just as easily say she only has a negative interpretation of semantics and only associates the word with people that sperg out like Vox's fanbases, or bronies calling Holos whores for collabing with the homos.
It doesn't end. Which is to say that entertaining your argument is just as useless as every other mentally ill retard that took that tweet to be a personal insult aimed PERSONALLY at them. You have no ground to stand on.
