>>34405471are you sure? i remember seeing a /sbg/ in /jp/ archives that seemingly dated back to sometime before /vt/, but i guess my memory could be off. there is some guy who keeps insisting that, because the project is collaborative, he can therefore just change canon on a whim, and somehow this doesn't harm the collaborative efforts of those whose lore he has changed. it seems like an utterly counterproductive position to bring up collaboration in such a situation to me.
all of these arguments about how new lore should be respected and what not seem to suffer from the same self-defeating flaw of being more easily applied in the reverse. the new should collaborate with what already exists instead of changing everything up, else the old might leave if they don't get to have their intended system, and especially if their intended system gets ruined after all the effort they put into it, yet the opposite arguments keep coming up for some reason. idk, am i misunderstanding something?
