>>55923006>I'd rather have Shermans than their cost equicakent in tiger 2s Looks like someone's been drinking the tiger rebound copium too much.
Look, the Tiger is not some god like weapons platform like the first 50 years after the war made everyone to believe, but it's also not completely shit like every web article of the last five years has been implying.
Ignore the thumbnail, as his opnion is more nuanced than one way or the other.
https://youtu.be/r3f8GHRptKAAnd also he gets somewhat into the doublethink of "numbers don't matter" and then "all that mattered was how it actually performed," but in the minutia of how some of the good points and bad points affected each other, and the overall performance, I think he has good points that are worth paying attention to.
