>>36745872>done on purposeThe populations don't decline "on purpose", this is a natural consequence of being educated and having a high standard of living, parents no longer need to shit out babies nonstop for labor. Point out a place where this doesn't happen, it will be less developed. Don't worry. They'll catch up and face this problem too, but they may not even have immigration as a solution.
Problem: A developed population will decline independently of whether you import people from developing countries or not. (Even the 2nd and 3rd generation of immigrants will stop having enough kids to reach replacement levels as they assimilate.)
That^ is indisputable as far as I know, but feel free to try. If you think that that is not true as a natural function of socioeconomics then feel free to point out a large country where that isn't the case. You're rich, you've solved one of the greatest economics issues by showing that the greatest problem just doesn't exist. If not, then here are some possible solutions for you to choose from.
1. Ignore it: Your economy is now fucked. Like really, really, really fucked. If you're unironically ignoring history and blaming some secret cabal for a well-observed phenomenon that's happening everywhere, then you're likely doing it due to some dissatisfaction with your economic status. Should you choose this solution, the irony that manifests down the road will be so palpable that you will laugh at yourself in the bread line.
2. Allow immigration: Considered attractive as this generally a win/win for both parties, as both will enjoy a higher standard of living than otherwise. And if you're so worried about being a dominant population, you still will be. From another perspective, you become part of a rich elite who now resides above a lower class. You don't simply disappear. Becoming a minority is not at all the same as being a "minority". Think of it in terms of that small racial group that you believe somehow controls the world.
3. Birth more babies: We tried. You'll encounter a famous and glaring example if you simply lurk on this board. It didn't work, effectively this is the same as #1. Ignoring it. Now, maybe you CAN get this to work, and sure, figure out how without spending enough to counterproductively ruin the country and I'm sure you'll be well-rewarded. Good luck.
>>36742912Theory does not carry the whimsical and tentative connotation you're implying here at all. Here are some scientific concepts that have theory in the title: cell theory, theory of evolution, germ theory, collision theory, kinetic theory of gases, Lewis theory, molecular theory, transition state theory, valence bond theory, atomic theory, plate tectonics theory
First search results^. The bait was right. Now sure, maybe one of those is flawed or wrong, but they're not a modern "Jews are causing the black plague again" wrong, running exactly opposite to all scientific and historic study.
>>36743346That's much more catchy, plus I can pretend that you're joking about being a literal ape. The original commenter was right. It's now much more clear why you all favor buzzwords and pseudo-pithy statements. They hide the disturbing empty void that constitutes the empirical foundation of your beliefs and worldview. Like this:
>>36736050nuh uh, go back tranny!
