>>41914994Holy shit, now this is gaslighting. Any and every post that makes kronii's unicorns out to be the victim in all this is either kidding themselves or a unicorn themselves. The issue was always the unicorns for doing this to themselves. As proof, notice how there was absolutely no problem UNTIL she collabed with males. Her retarded unicorns insisted the issue wasn't the collab itself but the fact she didn't post the schedule until after the collab (or right as it started, I don't remember that specific detail); treating
it as a "communication" issue. Had any of them dug around a bit, they'd know everyone involved in that collab had already posted their schedules which included it. I even saw some anons here posting those other schedules as some kind of "gotcha!" to the ones pedalling the "male hating, lesbian, tranny kronii" rrat. The point is, everyone already knew damn well it was going to happen ahead of time. Only her unicorns decided to pretended not to know, using it as mask to hide that what they were actually seething about was the fact that she collabed with males (and laughed a little too hard for their taste kek. Nevermind that she was laughing AT the boys' misfortune, not exactly with them). Kronii didn't notice this façade on time(**this will be important later)and made the mistake of giving them a chance to explain their displeasure. On and on the unikronies tried to insist it was a criticism on her miscommunication until a few based(though pathetic) unikronies made it clear the issue they had was with the collab in general. That's when more kronies decided to take the mask off and agree with them. That's when kronii noticed she was dealing with actual parasocial incels(or was at the very least made aware some of them were in the chat). That's where the "female friends" and "idol culture" quotes came in. Clearly to kronii, all she did was collab with her new coworkers, so what's the big deal? She must have seen a significant amount of schizo posts talking about getting cheated on or how she was basically flirting with the boys the entire stream(she almost had beef with the blue one at the start. ffs, watch streams) so she must have thought that shipping was the issue. She wasn't too far off, the issue was that people with cuck mentalities convinced themselves that's what was going on. Basically, she tried dealing with schizos on that unarchived member's stream. You can't win with those fucks. But even after all that, she laid out some terms
>she would NOT stop doing male collabs, she would not initiate them, probably not tweet to them that much, and she would not stream her POV to them**However, these conditions were made under the impression that she was dealing with people who weren't unicorns and actually critical of her not communicating better. Those conditions was her proof and first attempt at communicating better with her fans by letting them know beforehand. And that should have been it, but the unikronies mask was already falling off and they were getting their grievance script all wrong. The only consistent grievance was the collab itself and the only difference it had with all prior collabs she did was the fact that it was with males.
It was made painfully clear that really was the only actual issue they had with the whole thing so she stopped giving a fuck about this unicorn group and in no uncertain terms came out and said she'll fo what she wants. Those unicorns and shitposters are still seething months later.
Kronies were the ones who decided to latch on to some parasocial aspect. You can't blame kronii for her fans' interpretation of the movies she did a watchalong for; that's entirely a community/meme thing. And like hell kronii didn't have anything going for her when she started, she had her persona like the rest of council. The same way fauna was the soft speaking motherly one, mumei the "dumb" forgetful one, kronii was the cold narcissist. As time went of you could see she had a gap moe going on as a meme lover and somewhat of a fucking brat. by the looks of it, it still works, she's got 15k ccv playing the autism block game as I type this and has held that for at least an hour. The only thing I don't understand is the "tweeting at them" condition. Was she talking about it in terms of not initiating a conversation with them(as in, not being one to start a thread) or as in not tweeting at them at all? Because if you're gonna collab and the participants tweet about it, it's almost guaranteed that the participants of that collab will comment on it with each other publicly. I don't know what the thought process was with that one
