>>42352417>It's literally taken art that's already made and mashing it up with other artit's literally not though, otherwise when you reverse image search any AI art image you should get suggestions of what it's supposedly copying directly.
>When I draw a picture influenced by something else it's literally not the same.how is it not the same? Explain.
>>42352579>AI literally can't do that.I'm gonna piss you off with an even bolder claim: real artists in fact can even be lazier and more derivative than AI art because of the effort involved and literally the only reason you or anyone else hates AI art and act so dismissive is entirely just human hubris.
AI art is an existential attack on your psyche that makes it where there's literally nothing special about being an artist, having talent or any of the work you put it in. It's jealously and fear of the creation being a threat to the ego, like Frankenstein trying to kill his monster or God punishing humanity for the Tower of Babel or Weylan's reaction to Fassbender in those shitty Prometheus movies. That's what it comes down to ultimately. That's why it's so viscerally infuriating to you.
