>>46540611>you've admitted that she supported the harassment against Silvervale by your own interpretation."I don't like what you did but I forgive you" is not "supporting" their actions. Peacemaking or fence riding at worst. Not even close to what you're thinking or the original retarded assertion that she was 100% saying Silvervale is the one who made mistakes, when NOTHING indicates she was saying that at all except Froot antis, VShojo antis, or /pol/tards saying so. When the people making assertions are people who hate someone to begin with, you should have been skeptical of their statements because of their motivations.
>Also, I would say that if my friends were engaging in a harassment campaign against another "friend" of mine, I wouldn't call that "mistakes."Fair, but it isn't on the same level of "throwing Silver under the bus" or whatever retarded notion people believe it was. There never was any attacking of Silver by Froot. Only dipshits believed that because it fueled the fire.
>Furthermore, the person who posted the screenshot of the chat was clearly engaging in subterfuge trying to obscure that Silvervale had been brought up at all before Froot's statement not expecting anyone to bother checking.That was me. I engaged in no "subterfuge" I went and found a shot from the VOD at the point where she said it and the comment was deleted so it didn't show up in the VOD. It also doesn't matter, if you want I can reinsert it right where it would be and it would make the point even more obvious that she was never responding to it, because it would have fit, on that image, between comments at the very top of that chat screen. In other words, it was there, and she didn't respond to it for 40 seconds. Meanwhile, you have comments much closer to when she made her comments that fit her response.
So, again, I put it to you: why are people convinced she was responding to the one and only comment about Silvervale that had been made within a few minutes before and after that comment with a nonsensical answer that didn't even address what the poster said. Then, why isn't it more likely she's responding to one of the other comment nearer to hers which more fit what she was responding to.
