>>48357691Evidence will only be admissible if it is relevant. Evidence will be relevant where its existence tends to indicate that one of the facts in issue is more or less likely. Basically, whether the evidence you are trying to introduce would help to decide the issue(s) before it.
Evidence can either be directly relevant, where it includes an observation, perception or description of a fact in issue; or circumstantially relevant, where the Judge or jury can use it to draw an inference which goes towards proving a fact in issue.
As stated above, when a person gives evidence it must normally be a direct account of what he/she actually saw or heard. A person’s interpretation or opinion will not usually be admitted as evidence.
Evidence Act 1977