>>49121110>FinanaShe herself has no idea about what she spouts, yet pontificates all the same. She should take her own advice first.
>Improve yourselfIncredibly vague and nebulous. It’s a blanket statement, a simple case of misdirection from criticism. Addressed nothing cleanly, leaving space for (wild) interpretation.
>KroniiPresumptive; the lack of knowledge over one’s own viewer base speaks to an unprofessional nature, if not intentionally grating. The statement itself is just jelly-brained.
>LiaA reflexive sentiment in response to flak. She was fully aware of the reasons as to why, yet simply casts off the blame, later apologizing despite this. Simply analyzing the situation more swiftly would’ve prevented this, more than likely.
>EliraThis one is accurate on all counts, albeit bluntly delivered and lacking finesse. If you make such a statement, you must be fully prepared to deal with the ramifications of your actions. An orator, she certainly is not.
>FaunaAlthough correct, the premise for answering as such she did was bait. Fauna is in no way new to the internet, and falling for bait is simply amateurish when you consider that it can easily get you into way hotter waters than just shitposts on /vt/.
>SummaryAll-in-all, none but the careers of those already declining are impacted by these statements, and even then, only a microcosm will chip itself away versus their own individual decisive continuities as chuubas. This is immaterial to their overall asinine statements, however, which all are impulsive by nature.
