[221 / 23 / ?]
Quoted By: >>4924821 >>4924823 >>4924906 >>4924972 >>4924989 >>4925045 >>4925406 >>4925493 >>4926119 >>4926309 >>4926475 >>4926848 >>4927075 >>4927479 >>4927555 >>4927627 >>4927936 >>4927983 >>4928037 >>4928057 >>4928583 >>4928924 >>4928996 >>4929428 >>4934390 >>4937324 >>4937393 >>4938489 >>4940769 >>4953844 >>4959205 >>4960960 >>4965497 >>4975673 >>4980022 >>4985580 >>4985629 >>4986558
So now we have a fuller understanding of the situation:
>Cover has learned from attacks on it's talents and from youtube takedowns that they need to be more proactive in policing content, because a slight offence can balloon into a company destroying shitshow. They feel they need to take these steps to protect their talent and the company. And they are right on this. It is an unfortunate side effect of growth.
>Coco wants to make content that pushes the envelope like she used to when she first joined, and doesn't want to be constrained by managerial policies. She's not happy streaming minecraft and making meme reviews, she wants to be creative. She's right on this. She shouldn't have to be cornered into making streams she doesn't enjoy.
So what do we do now, when there's no one to blame?
>Cover has learned from attacks on it's talents and from youtube takedowns that they need to be more proactive in policing content, because a slight offence can balloon into a company destroying shitshow. They feel they need to take these steps to protect their talent and the company. And they are right on this. It is an unfortunate side effect of growth.
>Coco wants to make content that pushes the envelope like she used to when she first joined, and doesn't want to be constrained by managerial policies. She's not happy streaming minecraft and making meme reviews, she wants to be creative. She's right on this. She shouldn't have to be cornered into making streams she doesn't enjoy.
So what do we do now, when there's no one to blame?
