>>53362951>It is not really in huge demand in the part of the world that actually matter.True and you said it well, it is a niche within a niche.
It is a very lucrative niche too, and one almost thoroughly dominated by a single company which is the only one offering that particular product right now.
>More people would rather watch m*les like Vedal and "whores" like vhosjo, or Ironmouse in particular because the people that actually matters like the chuubas cater to their own culture more often than not.True but, as mentioned above and in
>>53362758, Hololive found themselves a completely unoccupied niche
>entertainment for people that aren't really interested in watching what caters to the current North American (and western) content preference.They went to corner that market and achieve a success so resounding that their original five members of the English speaking branch ended up becoming synonymous with "sucessful vtuber" in the western world and the measuring stick for the whole rest of the industry.
>>53363035>We literally have hard numbers on thisAnon, did you misread
>>53362849? Here is the full exchange
>(>>53362779) most of the time have better charisma than what the mainstream media shit out.>(>>53362849) you'll have to put some names in this statement because you seem to be painting a figure of the "mythical good western streamer" that might be very hard to proveYou are saying there are streamers catering to the north american and western market that get big numbers and that's obvious and needs no proof.
The whole conversation is about the type of content they make, and how there is a huge segment of the audience that deliberate avoid that exact type of content, and how Cover managed to secure that "opted out" market for themselves and thrive with it.
