>>5392291>No. And by shitfit, I don't mean people being just being salty. Shit like Love Live, Kannagi, etc. is the only time you see people unironically mass sending death threatsNaruto got it, Bleach got it. Hell, Iseyama has literally gotten THOUSANDS of death threats over the course of AOT's run. Go ahead, type in [big author with controvertial event in their series] followed with "Death threats". You evidently don't hang out in many large fandoms. People still send hate out to authors for the ways their series ended decades ago.
>Except in none of those works are people building a parasocial relationship between them and the creator.Irrelevant
>"I'm never going to watch another George Lucas film after what happened in the prequels".You honestly think there aren't millions of people who wrote off George Lucas as a hack after the prequels. The prequels which are a direct result of giving him more creative freedom? What world are you living in?
>People have already explained to you that they're not talking about someone who already knows their audience in mind, and wants to pander specifically to that audience.Except, I've already explained that this is the type of chuuba I'm talking about though? My first reply literally starts with that.
>If a chuuba wants to talk bout males on stream, they shouldn't be bombarded with "wow a male how could you betray me?" Trying to refine your product doesn't mean anything when the person is literally the product.This is called wanting to have your cake and eat it. Anyone can be like FBK and the Vshojos and set the record straight right off the bat. Building a fractured fanbase without refining to a specific demographic and then suffering the fallout later is your fault as a creator, whether that's a videogame like OW, an anime like Tokyo Ghoul or a chuuba like Koopa apparently. It's nice to play both sides and all, but eventually, you're going to piss one off. At any rate, it's not even that common.
>Being disgruntled about Hololive isn't the same as Rushia.I don't care, Rushia was just an example of a unicorn chuuba. Extrapolate at your own peril
>Multiple members in Hololive have stated they wanted to collab with males while not being able toThis is not a thing. Any chuuba can collaborate with males whenever the fuck they like. Cowardice because, again, they wanted to have their cake and eat it is not an excuse.
>Also your assurance of vtweeters/disgruntled indies means jack shit.Good to know that's where we're at.
>Except one is backed by a company that is specifically limited their talents from collabing with malesNope.
>It's not a simile either. It's an exaggeration. Also I don't think you understand what a simile is.Alright, simile or not, I'm getting tired so I'll just break down and explain what I meant:
>The question:Why does Unicorn always called people who enjoy normal relationships between humans(it wasn't even romantic) as "cucks"?
>The answer:What you're asking me is like asking, "Why do people call me a cuck just because I let my wife have sex with other men? I enjoy seeing them do it."
>The explanation:My second "cuck" example actually had nothing to do with the original question directly. It wasn't a direct comparison, but I can see how in a long comment chain, it might be misconstrued as such.
The point of my answer is that, "If GFE is the expected norm, then you saying that want these GFE chuubas to collab with men is the strange thing." as a rebuttal to the "who enjoy normal relationships" parts.
The cuck comparison was simply an example of a person saying "why are you calling me strange just because I'm doing [strange thing]?
I could easily have said, "Why do people call me a Nazi just because I hate jews?" or "Why am I getting shot down just because I flew into enemy airspace?"
It is not an exagerration, because the two were not directly connected. Perhaps it would have landed better had I called it a figure of speech, but somehow, I doubt it.
