>>55666075>That only makes sense if Rushia was somehow getting a better cut than the rest of the company.Not a better cut, a better absolute value as she was most certainly, if not the heaviest hitter of the company, at least one of top 3.
They made more money both in the areas of the company whose cost of compensation for the talent is proportional to the revenue and in the areas of the company whose cost of compensation for the talent is either fixed or zero.
You and I are speculating based on incomplete data, but here is a though experiment
>every talent gets a raise YoY, increasing the cost of compensation by X>UPROAR, ID3 and Tempus increase the cost of compensation by Y>Rushia (and Sana) leave, decreasing the cost of compensation by ZIf X + Y < Z the conclusion is that the compensation YoY between 2023 and 2024 decreases
There is no way to prove X happened one way or another but likewise your implication that the talent got a smaller amount in 2024 can't be proved either for the reasons just exposed above.
If the impact of losing Rushia was big enough (and it definitely was), even increasing the talent pool and the compensation for the remaining of the talent wouldn't increase the total compensation YoY, which is the point I am making.
All of this is not even taking in consideration that several other heavy hitters (Aqua, Gura, Shion, Ina, Ayame) had reduced activities in the whole FY (or most of it) and also contributed to the decreased cost of compensation.
