>>56596604>>56596712AI comes in different forms and doesn't need to be considered as a whole
I don't think the audio AI is an issue as it's both less intrusive coming in the form of a single link which contains all the content, it's relatively infrequent, and it is usually of higher quality as the underlying content the voice is slapped on to is originally popular for a reason and can be consumed more casually and less autistically
If it gets to a point where anons just start replying to each other all the time with AI voices instead of actual text, then it'd be problematic.
Somewhat relevant too is actual real audio clips mashed together have more soul and value to them considering it's from the true source, so once we start getting streams and new clips flowing the relevance and worth of the AI will go down
>>56597081Agreed, I was actually gonna reference that exact post as one of the "unless something truly original or unique comes of it" examples because it's pretty cool and feels like a plot I could actually enjoy fleshed out in a movie, series or book. I don't dislike AI or the use of the AI chatbot, just the potential degradation of the thread to endless mindless gooning as all thoughts get outsourced to a sexbot
