>>60328331>>60328331That channel is great. Even though Titanic specifically has a ton of coverage, he's done a very good job at explaining how she was laid out and functioned. How she was both typical, and superb, for a ship of that time. There's a lot to discover about famous ships, and other ships waiting to gain the notoriety they deserve.
>>60328416No because they're mostly lightweight construction and not suited for mounting heavy equipment or for damage control.
The British and Germans tried using ocean liners as auxiliary cruisers in WW1 and it wasn't worth it.
Though there's an interesting story of German liner disguised as a British one, running into the real British ship.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Cap_Trafalgar#Sinking 
