>>62573576>>62566670And even amongst the incredibly small amount of women who PRETEND to be "bi", they're at absolute most 5-10% bi at best and only possess a "romantic" or "emotional" attraction, not a physical or sexual one (the only two that actually matter), and are still infinitely more physically and sexually attracted to, and aroused by, men and men's physical appearance, because women literally can't get horny over females' physical appreance. They literally just can't. It just doesn't happen. There's nothing in their brain that allows them to be able to. They can't look at a woman's face and get horny over it. They can't look at a woman's body and get horny over it. They can't look at a woman's pussy and get horny over it. It's just not a thing. They can quite literally only be aroused by men's physical appearance/features (Men's faces, men's bodies, men's penises). Basically, what you posit as sexual attraction to women is merely "emotional" attraction and you're confusing it with sexual/physical attraction, when it's nothing of the sort. Women can be sexually, visually, physically, romantically, and emotionally attracted to MEN, but when it comes to other women, they can very specifically only be emotionally/romantically attracted to women, never physically, visually, or sexually. Because of this, "emotional attraction" doesn't count as anything, especially not an ACTUAL, legitimate type of attraction or anything related to sexual arousal, and therefore should be automatically disregarded and treated as an illegitimate form of attraction, since only physical and sexual attraction/arousal matter and those aren't present in female/female attraction. Oh, and your idiotic, little harem theory is completely wrong, by the way, and is very easily debunked by pure common sense, logical analysis, and applying more than five seconds of thought on the matter. Once again, Don't even try to contest this fact or contradict it. I am 100%, objectively, incontrovertibly correct about this.
