>>6329152>>6329616That anon again.
>It’s not the fact that Nyanners tried to distance herself from lolicon, I can respect that; it’s the fact that she denounced it as pedophilia/CSA.I understand that. I think she really was not careful with her words and wrote the tumblr post hastily to be honest, but you can't know that for sure and neither can I. Nyanners, a lot of newfags who try to defend her, and even myself when I was still a newfag, are all not very careful when it comes to expressing themselves on this topic. I've heard out anons on the other side of the fence and I've shifted my views on the topic a lot, which is why I'm careful to say things like "pedophilic spectrum" rather than simply calling people "pedophile", which is just not accurate.
>See pic related, it also felt like her actions were rooted in nothing more than doing what was convenient for her success AND also taking contradictory actionsThat's the perception most antis have of her, yeah, and once you see someone a certain way you can twist anything and everything they do to fit to your narrative. I don't think Nyanners was ever really confident with any of her convictions. You can definitely blame her for that, I'll never claim that the pink cat is perfect. All I'll say is that she's not a hypocrite -- she's not profiting from the sexualization of lolicon (which, in my interpretation, is what her blog post was about), even if you consider her model a loli (which is extremely subjective; if you like her you won't see her that way, if you don't then you will).
>See, being specific to lolis, what I like about them is that they’re cute and small, I just find those characters and the anime aesthetic adorable. I would also say the idea of the taboo also has its own appealLolicons who are in it simply for the cuteness of it are A-OK, anyone who complains about these types is just plain retarded. Unfortunately, people conflate things a lot, so labeling yourself as a lolicon even if you don't fap to it will inevitably bring upon you a sea of retards.
>When saying 2D!=3D, it’s saying you should not compare drawings to the livingYeah, my argument was never 2D = 3D. It's that fantasies, if experienced for a long time with a strong enough passion, are indicative of some level of sexual attraction. I don't think you really explained very well how my yaoi analogy was wrong: "I don’t exactly think having homosexual fantasies means you’re attracted to men"... Could you elaborate on that?
>I’m not exactly able to explain it well, but I don’t feel attracted to children, and yet lolis have such fantastic assets that make me attracted to themYeah, I don't doubt you anon. I don't share your feelings, most sexual loli pics offput me more than they make me erect (though it depends, some artstyles just... work, somehow). Oh and thanks for
>>6329642, that's a surprisingly nice thing to read on this site. Hope you have a good day too.
