>>63344640I know nobody here actually watches this guy, so let me break it down for you.
>I don't like sexualization on characters that don't have a say in it or it is used in some way to push them down or make them an objectHe was talking about how he's fine with characters like Bayonetta that deliberately use their sexiness as a tool or source of empowerment. In the context of this conversation, characters "not having a say" refer to situations in the narrative where they are forcibly objectified by others (ex. captured and put in a provocative slave outfit against their will for fan service).
Its more that he doesn't like this writing trope than anything related to whether fictional characters CAN consent in the first place.
>>63344684>Did you watch Wakfu? I did. I think the show, much like the game, was at times a little to sexualized, especially since I'm pretty sure it was all a bunch of kids in that show.>"Just remember they are all fictional characters". I don't give a shit if they're fictional characters, I'm not sexualizing fictional children.I haven't played or watched Wakfu, but I do know about it. A quick google search shows that most of the main cast of characters at least started out underage, so this isn't a 500 year old loli situation.
All he is stating is that he doesn't want to sexualize underage characters. This is like the most safe corpo-friendly take, why are you all upset about this?
>But Hololive sexualizes lolis all the time!Ok, and you guys keep saying Holostars =/= Hololive so what does it matter?
There's also the debate about if loli refers more to the age or body type, but that's besides the point.
He's just expressing HIS preferences, so as long as he doesn't go attacking others about it he's fine.
>But he will EVENTUALLYThen save your seethe for when it actually happens.
