>>66839346I think you're autistic. There are different levels of breeches of contract and we don't know how bad Mel's was. There's no reason to trust that Cover isn't overreacting and firing her for a minor offense or accident, and such a firing over something petty without trying to work with her would be insulting to fans and a betrayal of their purpose as management.
Like I said before, accidentally leaking a concert date to a friend while talking about your schedule shouldn't get a talent fired. But we don't know if that's what happened any more than if she sold company secrets. One is ultimately harmless, while the other damages the company, and yet they would both be breaking NDA. That's why I would prefer Cover say the nature of the leak, but my guess is that because they aren't, then it must be something petty and they don't want fans to become angry with them for firing her over some stupid bullshit technicality. Additionally, when they don't say anything, subhuman brainlet bootlicking retards like you start accusing the fired talent of the worst possible offenses, no matter how unlikely.
I'm sad that you have an IT job. You aren't smart enough to think for yourself and you don't belong anywhere near the tech sector.