>>67786663>Making an entire post about "the issue" is you doing that.No, it isn't. It is you being autistically (and more importantly, INCORRECTLY) hyperliteral and assuming that "the issue" *has* has to be a literal singular item, which is simplistic, shallow and one-dimensional thinking.
>There is a person... like literally everyone.This is my whole point, you moron. The fact that people have issues and feelings does not imply that issues do not exist - it in fact EXPLICITLY necessitates that they DO exist.
>Literally nothing has fundamentally changed.Pulling things out of your ass again, are we? You have no evidence, and Gura's behavior is clear evidence to the contrary.
>I have said, probably literally to youBelieve me, this is thankfully the first time I've ever had this particularly mind-numbing conversation. Aim better. While you're at it, maybe learn a lesson in humility - to stop making assumptions and pretending to understand the first thing how humans operate while laughably whining about other people engaging in speculation and mistaking one anon for another on the basket weaving forum.
>that because she was streaming didn't mean she would keep streaming, that she would disappear and then eventually stream again, and wow, look, that fucking happened.The fact that her behavior changes magically proves that her behavior changes for no reason?
Anon, that is literally the dumbest thing I have ever heard in my life. Gura could literally live forever while oscillate between streaming and ghosting ten thousand times, for literal *years* at a time, and it would still not somehow constitute evidence that nothing ever happens to her. All it means is that these are all particular and isolated events with their own narrative and cohesive internal logic, which happen to have outcomes which may or may not be similar in particular ways (whether they influence her to stream or engage on Twitter more or less). Stop oversimplifying things by trying to boil everything down to a single unified function - otherwise, *I* can simply point to the fact that her behavior probably will change again in the future (after all, if ONE thing managed to make her ghost this hard for this long, then it stands to reason that a similar stimulus would produce a similar outcome) and say, oh, would you look at that, SOMETHING HAPPENED AGAIN, and know that it proves *me* right - not you.
>Please just remember this conversation next time you're whining and trying to "figure out" the exact same situation for the 15th time.I'll remember that you threw a temper tantrum because you were too prodigiously, jaw-droppingly stupid to notice the simple, inarguable fact that you and I and any other number of anonymous faggots could literally have this conversation for the fifteen TRILLIONTH time, and you would still be NO closer to proving the nonsense-upon-stilts that is a) things keep happening, therefore b) they must only ever happen for no reason, and also c) they all must only ever be part of one singular interconnected causal chain of events and never be unrelated, QED
