>>68381533Oh no, nothing like that, it's just that I couldn't find that post so I was just piggybacking off the other post. I do think that post did underestimate Gura's stock though, I remember seeing something else about that
I see this post
>>68215113 which has Gura at 1043, but with a snapsnot taken later, so maybe gura had 1100 to start?
Anyway let's see what I get if I combine these two
>>68380028>>68381533@name @currentstock [@stock since since
>>68214983]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Mori Calliope 415 [105]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Takanashi Kiara 243 [67]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Ninomae Ina'nis 700 [160]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Gawr Gura 840 [160]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Watson Amelia 385 [85]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - IRyS 359 [111]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Ceres Fauna 370 [150]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Ouro Kronii 329 [111]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Nanashi Mumei 374 [206]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Hakos Baelz 364 [86]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Shiori Novella 326 [124]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Koseki Bijou 260 [90]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Nerissa Ravencroft 346 [104]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Fuwawa Abyssgard 421 [179]
Valentine's Day 2024 Set - Mococo Abyssgard 419 [181]
Okay that gura initial stock is definitely wrong given trends, she should be a bit above the ina/mumei/fwmc cluster. But I guess the rest looks ok.
