>>68962154The termination notice was three days before she streamed and said she was making the document and was in touch with lawyers Mr Man found for her, dumbass.
The document in question didnt even exist yet, you dont know what youre talking about.
> she would go public with the legal documents There's The Document, and there's medical documents. There's no legal documents yet because there's no legal case yet.
You don't know what you're talking about.
>that she is legally bound not to go public withShe's not legally bound by shit, she clearly doesnt have an NDA preventing her from doxxing the entire company if shes free to give personal details to her lawyer.
>NDFI dont follow dramatubers you'll have to ask him yourself
>>68962521You wouldnt need a timestamp to pilpul if youd seen the stream, touristchama.
>legal documentswho?
>leaked to liversOnly lawful thing to do since she was threatening legal action. We've been through this extensively. If someone sues your employees you have to tell them. It doesnt matter if its confidential, you need to give them the necessary parts, read
>>68955536Also the other post you quoted is also me. Apparently I'm the only one ITT that read the tweets and isnt a neurotic retard.
