>>68984561We know that the top 20 talents make 60% of the revenue, so it's possible that the top 21-40 also took 60% of the remaining, then top 41-60 take 60%, etc.
They never really said much about the distribution, so this is some napkin math:
Assuming that kind of distribution you'd get:
\- Top 1-20: $1.572M (\~$80K/ea average)
\- Top 21-40: $628.8K (\~$30K/ea average)
\- Top 41-60: $251.5K (\~$10K/ea average)
\- Top 61-84: $167.7K (\~$7K/ea average)
Which gives even the lowest earning talents a solid upper middle class wage
