>>77405It doesnt have to be on youtube. I'd consider bilibili or twitch or whatever other platform as also "vtubers".
As a rule of thumb if you could consider them streamers/youtubers without the facerig, they're vtubers. If not, then not. Again, expanding youtuber as "someone that makes videos online", in good faith. Dont be a pedant on this you know exactly what I mean by "youtuber".
>>77486This is a debatable one, but while he certainly fits the "person with a facerig", I dont think he's a vTUBER.
If he didnt have the avatar on and it was just the voice actor doing his thing, would you consider it a "youtuber", skipping semantics?
>>77836I dont think mocapped actors count as vtubers. Maybe v-actors, if you want to.
To me this is similar to having Kermit the frog on a TV show, and no one would seriously consider a Kermit gameplay channel a vtuber.
