>>71717445>>71718321>The penalty never says an additional 50%.What the fuck do you think "50% of the Consideration" means!? Consideration is defined as "50% of the amount paid to and actually received by Party A with respect to the Distribution of the Contents" in Article 4, and this is describing the PENALTY. It's not a penalty if they aren't taking anything! And again they can take it ALL if they decide you violated any of dozens of provisions.
>Not how it works, retard. You have to prove how much the damages were to get someone else to pay it off otherwise that's illegal. They aren't legal damages, they are damages as declared by Nijisanji. There is no third party arbitration. It's entirely up to Party A to decide what "damages" entails.
>Yup, you can't read. Article 10, paragraph 2 specifically said the rest of the article is about things Nijisanji lends to membersNo, "Materials Etc" refers to ANY and ALL equipment used in Vtuber activities.
>You don't know anything about the law and it shows. [bullshit link] That's for CONTRACTOR law. No western government, if any government, would consider anyone with this much control held over them a contractor. There's an exclusivity clause FFS! It's clearly an employment contract, which is subject to labor laws. Though again, that assumes the talent actually gets a lawyer to tell them that.
>Proof? Because a stream going on while they are notified is an activity that happened BEFORE the noticeThey have to send you notice, there's nothing saying how nor that you have to receive the notice before agreeing to it. Article 23.2 says if Party B CONDUCTS (not "starts") ANY activity related to the Program within the fourteen day period, they accept. So if the written notice was SENT, which is the only thing Party A is required to do, and the talent was streaming at the time, they accept just by the fact that they were doing their job, whether the amendments were read or not.
>They use Slack first off and communicating with the manager isn't content or activity produced under the character. You're stretchingANY activity related to the Program. So yes, including communicating on Slack. You're right in that it wouldn't hold up in court, but a lot of things here wouldn't, again, that isn't the intent.
>Three months is never said in the article and what method do you think they'd use to purposely make the message arrive late? Pigeon? It's obviously always an email or message from the managerIt's a two year contract that auto-renews, and you must notify that you do not wish to renew three months before the renew date. And yes, Pigeon if they want. They choose the communication method both in and out - meaning they can make you reply by pigeon if they want.
>Retard. If the contract is terminated or not renewed, you aren't bound to anything in the contract except the things about leaving the contract after termination of it>EXCEPT THE THINGS ABOUT LEAVING THE CONTRACT AFTER TERMINATION OF IT.Which is EXACTLY what Article 28 defines, and it defines more than half the articles in the damned contract as survivable.
Which would NEVER hold up in court, but again, like nearly everything else, it's just there to terrify the talent.
