>>75152633>>75152814Jesus, I had to test this myself because it's too perfect of a dunk. Copypasted some passages from books predating AI as controls (5-15% chance of AI at most). Millie's tweets have a 93-100% chance of being AI.
You'd think things likes "this fun events" or inconsistent use of conjunctions ("you're" vs "you are") would have at least humanized it.
Reading it again after the AI detection tests really highlights the questionable nature of the tweets.
>Your smiles and cheers While technically valid, a vtuber reflecting on a 3D debut would probably use language like "Your messages, comments, and tweets", right?
>We all had planned to support each other by attending one another’s debutsThis is a temporal issue, right? It kind of implies that they ultimately failed to attend each other's debuts.
>While this might be our first time being on 3D togetherShould be "in 3D".
>These three debuts hold a special place in my heart Feels weird to talk about "our hearts" in the beginning and then state "my heart" when talking about the 3 debuts.
>Every time we see a familiar face in our comment sectionsAgain not really an issue, but you'd think a streamer would care more about familiar faces send message in chat rather than leaving comments on a vod.
Really, the AI detection tests made sense of the weird feeling I got from the inconsistencies and weird word usage. It just did not feel "Millie" given what I've seen from her.
