>>75393636No, no, nothing like that either. That's a whole different argument on how people want to define things, if they want to define by sex or gender, and if they want to go by gender, whether they consider it to be something that is synonymous with sex or something more socially defined and therefore malleable. Which is a whole can of worms that isn't what Hololive is about in the slightest.
Like, let's put it like this. Feminism is, broadly, the belief that women deserve to have rights. In that sense, Hololive is a clearly "feminist" organization, due to the IMMENSE power holo talents have over their organization. But they have limits, too, which isn't necessarily anti-feminist because feminism doesn't dispute that women are subject to limits (within the same bounds as any other person would be, which in the entertainment field, is true, as maintaining image is a big part of the business).
But Hololive doesn't PARTICIPATE in that argument, it isn't a political mover or shaker. But it does EXIST WITHIN THE CONTEXT CREATED BY PRIOR FEMINIST POLITICS, which is the largest stretch you can do to connect it to that, but it's fair. Basically, Hololive accepts the base premise that "Women have rights," and then leaves to do it's own thing with those rights, disconnected from any of the other squabbles that come in the future of that question.
