>>76233704> stemming from and lead by material needs ... is obviously quite difficult for humans to fully dictate.It's really not, as capitalism invents endless things that people don't need, or for that matter, haven't had a need for to begin with. The demand is manufactured in the first place to justify the supply.
And as we speak, we are moving away from such system, in particularly as it's spurred by shitlib global dominance - and toward multipolarity that'll make any such things more costly and risky. Part of the reason why shitlibs are moving towards utilizing ngos.
Regardless, lining up libs would go a long way towards speeding that up as well.
> surely you can at least appreciate the attempt to moderate some of the less wholesome facets of human behavior and thereby mitigate their unwelcome results. the issue is that the purpose of liberalism has, from the very beginning, been to justify capitalism. there's no there-there, the entire ideology is but a means to an end, and that end is economic conquest and exploitation. it doesn't mean how many people live, die, get killed, as long the numbers go up and shitlibs make profit. it's not just imperialism though, it's every facet of liberal society; look at approached to DV, approaches to "hate crimes," approaches to "LGBT," basically anything, it's just a grift for people to pocket money, and the only things that get done are things that maintain the illusion the system generates (democracy). "human rights" are merely one such tool in the arsenal. Christianity did the same. But at least Christianity had actual morality (and I'm hardly Christian).
> that has not committed heinous acts at some points of their history.Indeed. And the henious, but much needed act of rounding up libs & ruling class, will commence the beginning of a different system eventually. The issue is the pretense accompanying it; people yelling human rights as they rape and kill you, or in case of Israel, 'member the solider holding LGBT flag on the rubble & dead bodies in Gaza. The point being isn't some amorphous "hypocrisy," but the lies, manipulation, and so forth inherent within the ideology, the ideals, etc. whether it's trans shit, or even basic things like equality, individualism, etc. the entire ideology is built on lies and serves to justify large-scale social engineering, instead of adapting ideology & system to people.
> even if they're imperfectthe point isn't that they are imperfect, the point is that the function of said "human rights" is fundamentally different than what you believe it to be; in turn, you utilize said "imperfect' ideals to justify the reality of human rights - rape, murder, massacres.
> then is there any realistic way to prevent this phase from occurringmore than few, and attempts were made historically, internally as well. see: mother's movement to start with.
> You talk of the number of deaths that you attribute to liberalismit's just obvious stuff, I didn't even get to immigration & or its responsibility for every crime/inter-ethnic crime/etc for decades upon decades. I mean, we apply the same standards to nazis, so why not.
> racismno such thing
> You seem to admire Pinochetit's more about the sentiment, less the person
> I doubt they would be opposed to the idea of mass sterilisation of Indians on ethical grounds the point isn't about the action itself, but who lib-left are, and the fact "live and let live" is impossible with them
