>>76993318I know you're illiterate, but this is pathetic.
I already explained it needs likes to show that it's been seen.
I'm sure there are way worse things on twitter that definitely break TOS that some no-name account with 0 followers posted years ago, but it's existence wouldn't prove anything because it's unlikely such unknown posts would have ever been reported.
So showing any small number of likes just to show it's been seen is not an unreasonable or irrelevant metric. I won't explain this again.
>according to pornhub, according to youpornAre you really citing porn tube websites tagging system instead of a fucking dictionary? Ask someone else to explain it to you, but for the sake of brevity, consider it any sexual act between two or more people. The point of this was to avoid something like the ribbon example that I said which was never banned and is not even porn.
>According to you full frontal nudity is between soft and hardNo. I said full frontal nudity was between suggestive images/partial nudity like the ribbon example where no genitals are seen and hardcore pornography featuring fully visible penetrative acts.
>shion is not a loliAnd here we go. Shion was 16 when she joined hololive. Her model is based on a young teen. She has visible breasts.
Personally, I wouldn't consider her very loli-like because of the lack of child-like features, and objectively, she'd be an edge case.
The posts you linked had noticeable breasts however, so whether or not loli porn is allowed on twitter, those images wouldn't be removed by a moderator regardless. Same thing if you try and post an oppai loli.
