>>2211712No, I'm not the anon with the broken monitor.
But I had to difference
>>2211707 and
>>2211714,
turn contrast all the way up, and then invert to see what I'd missed.
You're right.
Not sure if it's a blessing or a curse if you if you can see that with your naked eyes.
I freely admit I can't. And I don't think it's my monitor.
Are you one of those rare tetrachromats?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachromacy