>>2157725OR here, not sure what you mean, since this looks finished to me- so thank you! The only issue I see is that her legs are closer together than in the original, if you or someone else could fix that that would be nice (
>>2157725, not attached which I saved as a JPG to post.)*
*Though I'm not sure how much that matters since the quality seems to be the same, the linked one is just a PNG but is 7 times the filesize. That's something I've never really gotten- should I really worry about image quality on the basis of PNG vs. JPG alone, specifically if I wanted to save a PNG as a JPG to reduce the file size? Get the impression it's only when the image is transparent.
