>>2171142Thanks! Though I agree, I didn't mean for it to be that low or straight-up lowleg- I meant for the top of her panties starting at about that line to be lowered to about that height, your version here is much lower than that. Also it would look better if it wasn't *that* straight, I think them curving upwards just a bit (like how they are on the right side) would be preferable (but still make the right side thinner like the left.)
Sorry if any of this is confusing. I went ahead and drew some rough outlines for how it should follow.