>>1721986k, thanks for your input.
>>1722008>I don't like the style and therefore think that the definition of minimalist is somehow wrong.No I never said that, stop >implying. When 99% of this thread is the exact same thing something is not right.
>I'm reading the definition of minimalist, I just don't know it.What? Can you please stop greentexting and just say what you mean.
>What I really want is power level hiding wallpapers, but I'm in this thread instead of the one I linked.Yet again I never said that. I just found those pictures to be a good example.
>This would of made everything else you said a lot less stupid if it were not for what followed.Obviously it is not a fact, I'm stating my opinion. They can vector how ever it they want I can't stop them, but it wouldn't hurt to try to be more creative about it. Now that I think about it, I guess it is easier with black & white and harder with color. The reason why I'm saying this is because it minimalist thread used to be more than just what OP picture was about. It's disappointing, and I had no expectation. Well to be fair it was probably just 1-3 people dumping.
>Is that suppose to be a joke?No, if you think just because the picture is related to naruto = bad then you need to look at it again. Check the artist who is drawing it on the top right that should answer your question. It was an art trade with a bunch of mangaka for naruto 10th anniversary if you couldn't tell. The technique of using white and black in the picture is complement each other very nicely, and yes that picture is minimalist even though it has a lot of detail compare to a lot of other picture here if you are implying it is not minimalist or bad. However, if you don't like the art style that is a totally different subject though.
But hey at least someone had the decency to actually respond.
