>>1789998You're right, laws have been passed saying that this type of content is illegal, but my argument was that there is no reason to. Google defines a child as "a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority."
By that definition, none of this could possibly be pedophilic, because none of it contains images of children.
You're right, though. Nothing I say matters, because neither mods nor lawmakers give even a single fuck about what I have to say, though I would say that some posts only arguably break global rule #3. It bans loli/shota
pornography. It would be a bit pedantic to try to argue that some of this isn't pornography, but the very fact that an argument could be made means to me that you shouldn't necessarily remove it just because you don't like it.
Good day to you too, sir.
