>>2067154I'll disturb where I please. And thanks, I made it quickly so I'd have something to attach to my reply. I did the same again here. Making or finding a wallpaper that isn't shit quality is very easy which is why I find the lack of quality here to just be lazy.
>>2067218Both of you pointed out mobile preferred. The ratio of mobile to desktop wallpapers here is too far out to even call this thread mobile preferred. No one even tried. I've made 3 now to contribute for a total time sink of maybe 30 minutes. It's not that difficult.
>Often much lower seems just fine on a mobile screenCall me a pedant but "seems just fine" isn't good enough for me. Maybe if you have a shitty budget phone. Upscaling on a 1440x2560 display, even with adaptive display, still looks bad.
>Removing watermarks and signaturesWhy am I responsible for the quality of your uploads?
>monochromatic>>2045277 does not have a monochromatic background. Turn your brightness up or get a phone with a nicer display. 3 of the 4 I pointed out as having strange ratios are not monochromatic, so your "most of” argument is wrong. Either way, this is a board for wallpapers, not images you found on DeviantArt that look like they could be turned into nice wallpapers. Do it yourself or go to IMT and then post a proper wallpaper. 
