>>7577504>My opinion, landscapes are the best way to do that. I think city skylines might qualify too.I agree, but probably I'd add a 3rd category to that of space and astronomical photos.
Personally if we're gonna way overthink this I'd likely want something a bit abstract and not something you'll get sick of like looking at London or the same tree.
Also as screen resolutions increase in 5 or 10 years and you get those dual 4K monitors in 15 years you're really gonna regret choosing a 1920x1080 wallpaper to use the rest of your life.
So that in mind I'd find the highest resolution image of deep space I could and choose that. This is one crop from hubble deep field but I'd probably just take the whole thing in the highest quality I could find.
Abstract enough to ignore when you want. But when you want to look at it there is practically infinite detail in there. Every single tiny point of light is an entire galaxy, and this is just a tiny fraction of the sky, that covered by a tennis ball at 100m