>>7038831>To say that no one cares about my post is incorrect because responding to it does necessitate the responder to regard this post as something warranting a response, which means you care. The reason you think this is fallacious is because in your mind "care" is defined as "positive consideration", whereas the term is actually used to describe "any consideration". Except that it's not your post that nobody cares about, it's the replies contained therein. His responding to your post does not a priori rule out not caring about the content of the post; he's responding to the fact that you made a post of that nature, not to its content.
There's also the fact that you attacked a minor technicality of his statement while ignoring the main point, however ill-communicated it was: that nobody positively regards mass replies of that nature. Which I suppose I should amend for accuracy's sake: nobody *outside of the desktop share thread* positively regards mass replies.
Is that better?
