>>7039208>>7039215First of all, I am not the same anon who initially responded to your terrible post. Please stop assuming I am.
Second, you speak to a lot of assumptions that you believe I'm making, such as
>Again you make an invalid assumption: that the content of the post is equal to the post itself,without actually providing any argument for where you see that assumption being made (protip: it's not).
Third, you attempt to deflect any criticisms of your incompetent defense using inaccurate metaphors and purple prose, and later refer to your paper-thin defense of a technicality as "refuting" a point which, in reality, you only sidestepped. As for your point about conjecture, this line of conversation is its own proof that said conjecture was valid.
Fourth, you actually managed to fuck up greentexting. You utter mongoloid.
In short, you are sticking your fingers in your ears and spouting jargon, then claiming that you won because you didn't hear a reply. Good job. But at least you're actually contributing to the thread while you fail about impotently, that's more than I can say about most of the imbeciles who go on at length like you do.
