>>7952240I assume he's referring to the actual Doctrine of Fascism, which is a pretty good place to start. Much better than Mein Kampf, which while interesting is chiefly an autobiography and not a political program or expression of principles. For National Socialism, rather than Fascism, I've heard good things about Rudolf Jung's book, but haven't read it myself. The Coming Corporate State by A. Raven Thomson and the Jose Antonio Anthology are both interesting ideological output from some of the more minor/less successful fascist movements.
If you want something general, treating all of the interwar movements, and "from the outside looking in," Zeev Sternhell, Stanley Payne, and A. J. Gregor are the names to look for. Their work and all the primary sources I listed are available on Library Genesis.
We do believe in things. As Sternhell and Gregor particularly show, we believe in many of the same things that leftists do; it's just expressed differently and modulated through a belief in hierarchical order or pessimism about the perfectibility of man. I don't say that to make it seem that we're not enemies, only that we're both ideological radicals with a revolutionary vision. This other person that I'm responding to, for instance, is absolutely not a fascist.
>>7952263I'm sorry anon but this is nonsense. I can make things simpler for you: in third-world countries, nationalism wears the mask of communism, and in first-world countries, judeoliberalism wears the mask of communism.
I sense that you're also trying to account for historical revolutions against communism, but those were either anti-Semitic revolutions (early) or American gayops (later). The kind of liberalism you like, which you term conservatism, is almost as moribund as communism itself, and the future is between judeoliberalism and some kind of fascism, however it may be expressed.
