>>7987739>1933-1945Really? And exactly how'd that end up?
That's right, it ended with millions dead across Europe, North Africa, and the Soviet Union, all because one man tried to take over the world in the name of his brand of socialism.
It ended with a large portion of the villages, towns, and cities across those regions either ruined to some degree or entirely destroyed, all because one man tried to take over the world in the name of his brand of socialism.
It ended with that one mentally unstable coward of a man dead by his own hand with his regime and ideology laying in ruins around him while murderous rapists from a different flavor of socialism ransacked their way across the dead mans capital city in a bid to get to him first.
It ended with those other socialists, and their cowardly apologists around the world, immediately trying to rewrite history in an attempt to both distance themselves from the dead mans ideology and to further the other socialists own equally dangerously ill-conceived ideologies.
So honestly now, that's not exactly a glowing and super positive end to your example is it?
And yet the same bullshit keeps happening somewhere in the world from time to time all across history, all in the name of one brand of socialism or other, and it always goes the same way, every single time without fail, and yet despite this, clueless poorly-educated people around the world not only still keep pushing for a socialist takeover of the world, but they'll actively try to defend socialisms mostly indefensible track record by claiming that it's never been properly 'tried'.
To which the only proper response is "Bullshit!"
Fact is, every possible flavor of socialism has been tried somewhere in the world at some point in time, and it has simply never ever worked, and it has never gone, or ended, well for the general population who find themselves under the socialist thumb, and so it simply needs to stop, once and for all.
