>>8070850>>8070868You think you're cutting through pretentiousness, but all you're doing is flaunting your own ignorance and lack of cultural sensitivity.
You accuse it of being grotesque and degenerate “for the sake of it” without even trying to understand the intentionality behind it. Instead, you dismiss it because you find its content and themes objectionable.
It demonstrates a narrow-minded view that can't comprehend the purpose of grotesque art, which is to challenge and provoke, not to fit neatly into your preconceived notions of horror or beauty.
No one expects you to like it. Indeed, I don't. But it’s unreasonable to let prudish views prevent you from considering that the work may possess deeper meaning than you are willing to acknowledge.
