>>6840781So Hitler = liberal/ism because Hitler did taboo things? You're not making much sense here. Trump did taboo things, does that make him liberal?
>>6840849And why wouldn't I use a modern definition? I doubt many could tell you the intricacies of the parties in the 1930s and 40s, when grampy was still in diapers. And if he wasn't in diapers, if he is still alive, he sure as shit isn't coherent. So why would people align with the past they aren't familiar with?