>>6063646Not a fan of colorsplash. The girl is wayy too far off to the side. If you have the means, center her at 1/3 or 2/3 horizontally. The background is fuzzy but not movie-like out-of-focus. I don't like the source material to begin with.
>>6063652The game icons on the right are shit. Otherwise not bad for stock.
>>6063667>>6063668Way too much font/size mixing, too many colors, inconsistent glass/flat/gradient panels and decorations. I'm not even going to begin to tear this apart. If you want to start ricing up to /wg/'s standards use
nanami-tan.info>>6063682Seems good for workflow but otherwise looks like stock Ubuntu -- huge icons and panels, no consistent colors, garbage in and out. Faenza (stock icons) only works with certain layouts.
>>6063727System info is very tightly spaced. Needs more minimal colors matching the wallpaper or better yet find one that's less terrible. The icons might make everything better if they were small and white.
>>6063739The thin clock font doesn't match the thick font of the other widgets. The cyan music visualizer doesn't work with the background. White in place of cyan all around would improve things significantly. The gray gradient icons don't match the flatness of everything else, they would be much better solid white.
>>6063810The large solid widget needs to be broken up into smaller ones and the ones without the translucent black background need it. Needs solid white icons on the taskbar.
>>6063814Too many different styles -- flat/gradient/glass panels, stock icons, font sizes and thicknesses
>>6063825I want to love this one so hard but the terminals aren't translucent like the browser's bookmark panel and the clock on the taskbar uses the worst possible font. That colorscheme is amazing.
>>6063838You haven't even begun to rice. Start with a non-vista taskbar and use
nanami-tan.info>>6063847Needs "This copy of windows is not genuine" for authenticity. Otherwise very nice.
(con't)
