>>6559993 Thanks OP. Anybody familiar with the theory that the current Queen and her side are supposedly not the rightful heirs?
Theres a show called: "Britains Real Monarch"
"In 2004, Britain's Real Monarch, a documentary broadcast on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom repeated the claim that Abney-Hastings, as the senior descendant of George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence, is the rightful King of England. This argument involves two disputed claims: first that Edward IV of England was illegitimate, based on the accusation that his supposed father, Richard, Duke of York, was absent at the time when Edward is thought to have been conceived; and second that the Plantagenet crown should have descended by male-preference cognatic primogeniture instead of agnatic primogeniture and conquest. Also, Henry VI had placed an attainder on Edward after he was restored to the throne, and named George, Duke of Clarence, as heir to the throne after Henry VI and his legitimate issue."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Abney-Hastings,_14th_Earl_of_Loudoun#Claim_to_the_throne_of_EnglandThis is the episodes
https://www.youtube.com/results?q=Britain%27s+Real+MonarchIts a really interesting take and if you base it on the rules of lineage they are correct
