>>6592715This dude
>>6591402is not me. He's just an anon that has more sense than the others in this thread.
I'm
>>6591147>His look a million times better than yoursI spent 5 mins on that shit to prove a point. No fucking shit it looks slightly worse. If I had bothered to spend 20 minutes to find a better paper texture than the first one I found on a google search, then yeah. It could easily look the same quality as the other.
All I'm saying, is it's so easy you could literally do this in 5mins, provided you had the resources.
As the other anon said
>Work smarter not harder 
