>>7345871I've somewhat lost my original argument as to why I'm discoursing with this bystander in the first place.
>desktop needs to compromise between form and functionYes, and that's fine. However, no one cares you've changed a couple colours of your generic all-the-same Windows taskbar. It adds no substance to the thread a part from making it discernible of whether you're a normie or not.
>You're a faggot and never had an original thought in your life.Ironic. Want to make it even more blantant that you're completely clueless about this topic?
>somebody who's never driven a BMW can still make objective claims about car designA corrected anecdote would be ricers being the designer of the BMW, not merely driving it. I was skeptical at first to call you out for been only using Windows as you were so adamant about your opinion, by the sounds of this response, it appears even more conspicuous that you have less grounds to even have a word in this conversation.
>Windows offers a good compromise between form and functionalityFor the normies and krill, for sure. But again, this is the desktop thread where anons come to share and rate each others' hard worked-on rices. Go ahead, people like you who post an empty desktop with a maybe translucent taskbar of your favourite colour; no one's stopping you.
>You could bring up examples how other OS are better at that or offer more optionsIt becomes more apparent that you've never been /g/pilled. Must be comfy over there in /v/ with your gayming safe sapce. I don't want to waste more time arguing on the internet than I have already, so ask this very question on /g/ and you will probably get your thread bumped to the limit.
>But instead you huff your own farts about Linux or something.Because I have grounds to hold my opinion about this matter? Unlike you who just spouts about "muh aesthetics and functionality" which was besides the point.
